Why College Students Should Question Utilitarianism
Table of Contents
- What Is Utilitarianism?
- Why Utilitarianism Sounds Great (But Isn’t)
- The Big Problems with Utilitarianism
- Why This Matters for College Students
- How to Dive Into Utilitarianism and Philosophy
- Common Worries (And Why They’re No Big Deal)
- The Bottom Line
Hey, college students! Ever heard someone say we should just “do what’s best for the most people”? That’s utilitarianism, a philosophy that sounds awesome but falls apart when you poke at it. It’s like thinking you can ace every class and party every night—good in theory, impossible in practice. Questioning utilitarianism sharpens your brain, helps you make smarter choices, and preps you for debates in class or at the dorm. Let’s break down why this idea doesn’t work, why it matters to you, and how to explore it without getting lost in philosopher jargon.
What Is Utilitarianism?
Utilitarianism is the idea that the right action is the one that creates the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Think of it like trying to make the most people smile at a party. It’s tied to thinkers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, who argued we should measure actions by their outcomes—more happiness, less pain.
At first glance, it’s super intuitive. Who doesn’t want a world where everyone’s happy? It’s like picking a group project plan that makes the whole team stoked. But here’s the catch: it’s way messier than it sounds.
Why Utilitarianism Sounds Great (But Isn’t)
Utilitarianism feels like a no-brainer because it promises a simple rule: maximize happiness, minimize suffering. It’s like choosing a pizza topping everyone likes. But when you dig deeper, it’s not just impractical—it’s logically shaky.
Imagine you’re planning a campus event. You could make 99% of students thrilled by hosting a huge concert, but it means one student has to suffer (say, they’re stuck cleaning up). Is that fair? Or what if making you super happy (like acing all your classes) means everyone else in your study group fails? Utilitarianism says “go for the most happiness,” but whose happiness counts more? And how do you even measure it?
The Big Problems with Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism has some serious flaws that make it tough to apply. Here’s why it’s a philosophical dead-end:
-
You can’t maximize everything: You can’t make the most people happy and maximize total happiness at the same time. It’s like trying to buy the cheapest car with the best gas mileage—those goals often clash. For example, a policy giving free textbooks to most students might sound great, but it could tank the campus budget, hurting everyone long-term.
-
Happiness isn’t measurable: You can’t put a number on feelings. How happy were you at your last birthday? Now imagine feeling “twice as happy.” Doesn’t make sense, right? Even if we scan brains (like some neuroscientists dream), neural activity isn’t the same as your subjective experience of joy or pain. It’s like trying to measure love with a ruler.
-
Everyone’s different: People experience happiness and pain differently. Caffeine hypes some folks up, while others barely feel it. Some handle stress better than others. How do you compare your exam stress to your roommate’s breakup pain? You can’t add them up like math homework.
-
What about animals?: Utilitarianism often includes “conscious creatures,” but we have no clue how animals experience happiness. Can you measure a dog’s joy from a belly rub against your joy from acing a test? Good luck trying to calculate that.
-
It ignores fairness: Utilitarianism can justify messed-up stuff. If torturing one person makes a million others happy, it’s “right” by utilitarian logic. That’s why moral dilemmas (like sacrificing one life to save five) expose its cracks—it doesn’t care about justice or individual rights.
In short, utilitarianism is like a group project where everyone’s shouting different goals, but there’s no way to tally the score. It’s not just hard—it’s impossible at every step.
Why This Matters for College Students
You’re at the perfect stage to wrestle with big ideas like this. Here’s why questioning utilitarianism is a win for you:
- Sharpen your thinking: Spotting utilitarianism’s flaws trains you to catch weak arguments in classes, TikTok rants, or campus debates. It’s a mental gym session.
- Make better choices: Utilitarianism pops up in real life—like choosing a major to “help the most people” or voting for policies promising “the greater good.” Understanding its limits helps you weigh fairness and long-term impacts, not just short-term vibes.
- Ace your classes: Philosophy, poli-sci, or ethics profs love students who can critique big ideas. Dropping a utilitarianism takedown in a paper makes you stand out.
- Navigate group dynamics: Ever been in a group project where one person’s “happiness” (slacking off) screws everyone else? Utilitarianism’s blind spots show why fairness matters in teams.
- Question the system: Politicians and corporations love utilitarian buzzwords like “maximizing benefits for society.” Seeing through that hype makes you a savvier citizen.
It’s like our Hume’s philosophy guide—doubting simple answers builds your intellectual muscle.
How to Dive Into Utilitarianism and Philosophy
You don’t need a philosophy degree to get started. Here’s how to explore utilitarianism on a student schedule:
Step 1: Read the Basics
- Utilitarianism 101: Start with John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism (short, readable) or summaries on SparkNotes. Check Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy for a deeper dive.
- Critiques: Read Peter Singer’s Practical Ethics for a modern utilitarian view, then counter it with Bernard Williams’ Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (or summaries online).
- Fun Intro: Watch CrashCourse Philosophy on YouTube for utilitarianism in 10 minutes.
Step 2: Think Like a Philosopher
- Test utilitarianism: Next time you face a decision (e.g., splitting a restaurant bill or picking a club event), ask: “What maximizes happiness? Does it feel fair?” List pros and cons, then see where utilitarianism fails.
- Moral dilemmas: Try the Trolley Problem (would you kill one person to save five?). Write down why utilitarianism’s answer feels off. Share it with friends for a dorm debate.
Step 3: Join the Conversation
- Campus clubs: Join a philosophy or debate club. Argue utilitarianism over pizza—it’s more fun than it sounds.
- Online communities: Check r/philosophy or r/askphilosophy for lively threads.
- Podcasts: Listen to Philosophize This! (philosophizethis.org) for utilitarianism and ethics breakdowns.
Step 4: Apply It to Your Major
- Poli-Sci/Pre-Law: Use utilitarianism to analyze policies (e.g., free college tuition). Argue why it ignores fairness or long-term costs.
- Psychology: Question how we measure “well-being” in studies. Are happiness surveys legit?
- Business: Debate if maximizing profits (a utilitarian move) screws over employees or customers.
Step 5: Keep It Chill
- Set small goals: Read one Mill chapter or watch a 10-minute video per week.
- Track insights: Jot cool ideas in a notes app or journal.
- Reward yourself: Nail a utilitarianism critique? Grab a coffee or binge a show.
Common Worries (And Why They’re No Big Deal)
-
“Isn’t philosophy too abstract?”
Nope, it’s practical. Questioning utilitarianism helps you make fairer choices, like splitting group project work or picking ethical internships. -
“What if it’s too hard?”
Start with YouTube or SparkNotes. You’re smart enough for bite-sized philosophy. -
“Why care about this now?”
These ideas shape your values and BS detector. Plus, they’re a flex in essays or job interviews.
The Bottom Line
Utilitarianism sounds like a simple fix—maximize happiness, done. But it’s a philosophical mess that ignores fairness, measurability, and individual differences. By questioning it, you’ll sharpen your thinking, make smarter decisions, and stand out in class or debates. Start small, dig into the flaws, and you’ll be philosophizing like a pro, ready to tackle college and beyond.
Ready to start? Check Mill’s Utilitarianism on SparkNotes or watch CrashCourse Philosophy. Join r/philosophy for chats, and try the Trolley Problem with friends. Be the student who sees through the “greater good” hype.
Disclaimer: This isn’t academic advice—just a way to boost your brainpower. If you want to manage chat memory, click the book icon below this post’s reference and select it, or disable memory in Data Controls.